Sneed v. . Bullock

77 N.C. 282
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 N.C. 282 (Sneed v. . Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sneed v. . Bullock, 77 N.C. 282 (N.C. 1877).

Opinion

Fairclotii, J.

Here we have rather a novel proceeding for trying title to an office, which is the only object of the plaintiff’s appeal.- During a session of the Superior Court, the defendant presents his credentials from the Board of ■County Commissioners, showing that he has been qualified and inducted into the office of Sheriff, so far as said Board • had authority to do so. The Judge after full consideration directed the Clerk to deliver all his future process and precepts to the defendant. The plaintiff, who had been discharging the'duties of said office for some time and still claimed the right to do so, resisted and appealed from said •order to this Court. No action has been instituted, no complaint. or answer filed, and no trial below except as above •stated.

We have held in Jones v. Commissioners of Granville, ante, 280, that title to an-office cannot be tried by an’injunction, .and we now hold that it cannot be tried by' motion. It has been several times declared that the appropriate and precise *283 mode of trying title to an office is by an action in the nature of a quo warranto. Patterson v. Hubbs, 65 N. C. 119 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C. 93.

Per Cukiam. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockard v. Wiseman
80 S.E.2d 427 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.C. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneed-v-bullock-nc-1877.