Snediker v. Quick
This text of 13 N.J.L. 245 (Snediker v. Quick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Theobjection is well taken. The copy of the rule is not certified to be a true copy by the clerk of the [246]*246court. Whether it is necessary, that the copy should be under the clerk’s own proper hand writing, may admit of a doubt; but on this point the court express no opinion. The copy of the rule must however be certified under the signature of the clerk.
Motion refused.
Cited in Harwood v. Smethurst 2, Vroom, 503.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 N.J.L. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snediker-v-quick-nj-1832.