Snediker v. Quick

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Snediker v. Quick

13 N.J.L. 245

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1832·Published

Opinion

By the court.

— Theobjection is well taken. The copy of the rule is not certified to be a true copy by the clerk of the [246]*246court. Whether it is necessary, that the copy should be under the clerk’s own proper hand writing, may admit of a doubt; but on this point the court express no opinion. The copy of the rule must however be certified under the signature of the clerk.

Motion refused.

Cited in Harwood v. Smethurst 2, Vroom, 503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

— Theobjection is well taken. The copy of the rule is not certified to be a true copy by the clerk of the [246]*246court. Whether it is necessary, that the copy should be under the clerk’s own proper hand writing, may admit of a doubt; but on this point the court express no opinion. The copy of the rule must however be certified under the signature of the clerk.

Motion refused.

Cited in Harwood v. Smethurst 2, Vroom, 503.

Snediker v. Quick, 13 N.J.L. 245 (N.J. 1832).

Pincite

13 N.J.L. 245 (Snediker v. Quick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.