Snediker Transportation Corp. v. Piel Bros.
This text of 256 A.D. 1080 (Snediker Transportation Corp. v. Piel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order vacating plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The matters as to which the plaintiff seeks to examine are pertinent to its alleged causes of action. The discovery and inspection of the records of the defendant may be availed of as incidental to the examination, but it does not constitute a substitution for an examination before trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 1080, 11 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snediker-transportation-corp-v-piel-bros-nyappdiv-1939.