Snedicker v. White

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Snedicker v. White

11 N.J.L. 88

DecidedSeptember 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 11 N.J.L. 88 (Snedicker v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snedicker v. White, 11 N.J.L. 88 (N.J. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Upon looking into the pleadings, we find that the plaintiff has extended his claim beyond his demand before the justice, in two particulars. It was for use and occupation for the term of five years, before the justice. The claim in this court is general; he might in this action recover for a longer period than five years. Before the justice, the demand was for thirty dollars;; *in this court, it is for one hundred dollars. It has [*89 been several times decided, that an extension here of the demand dissolves the obligation to adhere to the plea of.' title.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Upon looking into the pleadings, we find that the plaintiff has extended his claim beyond his demand before the justice, in two particulars. It was for use and occupation for the term of five years, before the justice. The claim in this court is general; he might in this action recover for a longer period than five years. Before the justice, the demand was for thirty dollars;; *in this court, it is for one hundred dollars. It has [*89 been several times decided, that an extension here of the demand dissolves the obligation to adhere to the plea of.' title.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 N.J.L. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snedicker-v-white-nj-1829.