Snead v. State

105 S.E. 249, 25 Ga. App. 772, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 205
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1920
Docket11820
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 249 (Snead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snead v. State, 105 S.E. 249, 25 Ga. App. 772, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 205 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was demanded by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Eldon L. Joiner, for plaintiff in error. Clifford E Hay, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 249, 25 Ga. App. 772, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snead-v-state-gactapp-1920.