Snead v. SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PENNSYLVANIA

966 A.2d 548, 600 Pa. 372, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 242
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 12, 2009·No. 555 EAL 2007, 556 EAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*373 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the lower court erred in disregarding the SPCA’s inherently governmental functions, including enforcement of Pennsylvania’s Dog Law, authority to arrest suspects and execute search warrants, and traditional animal protection and control roles, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541, in holding the SPCA was not entitled to sovereign or governmental immunity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snead v. SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PENNSYLVANIA, 966 A.2d 548, 600 Pa. 372, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 242 (Pa. 2009).

966 A.2d 548 (Snead v. SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF PENNSYLVANIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snead v. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
985 A.2d 909 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Rhoads v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
978 A.2d 431 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)