Snead v. Koenig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Snead v. Koenig

828 P.2d 1062, 112 Or. App. 646, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 768

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 22, 1992

DocketF1198; CA A70037

StatusPublished

This text of 828 P.2d 1062 (Snead v. Koenig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snead v. Koenig, 828 P.2d 1062, 112 Or. App. 646, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 768 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Father appeals an order requiring him to pay half of the counseling costs and half of the health insurance premiums for his minor child. He had moved to require mother to pay “at least 51% of the cost of the childfs] therapy.” He contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay any of the health insurance premiums, because mother did not make a written request for that modification.

Because a transcript of the hearing was not designated as part of the record, and no other documents in the record provide an adequate foundation for review, we cannot determine what evidence was presented to the trial court, whether any error was made or whether father acquiesed in the action of the trial court that he now asserts as error on appeal.

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Father appeals an order requiring him to pay half of the counseling costs and half of the health insurance premiums for his minor child. He had moved to require mother to pay “at least 51% of the cost of the childfs] therapy.” He contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay any of the health insurance premiums, because mother did not make a written request for that modification.

Because a transcript of the hearing was not designated as part of the record, and no other documents in the record provide an adequate foundation for review, we cannot determine what evidence was presented to the trial court, whether any error was made or whether father acquiesed in the action of the trial court that he now asserts as error on appeal.

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

828 P.2d 1062, 112 Or. App. 646, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snead-v-koenig-orctapp-1992.