Snead v. Ansley

160 So. 3d 952, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2015 WL 1650468
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-2846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 So. 3d 952 (Snead v. Ansley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snead v. Ansley, 160 So. 3d 952, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2015 WL 1650468 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

The trial court erred in granting appel-lee’s petition for protection against repeat violence because appellant was not given a full opportunity to present evidence in opposition to the petition. Accordingly, we reverse the injunction and remand for a new hearing on the petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur. MARSTILLER, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel Parise v. Sally Selph
175 So. 3d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 3d 952, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2015 WL 1650468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snead-v-ansley-fladistctapp-2015.