Snead v. Ansley

160 So. 3d 952, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2015 WL 1650468
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2015·No. No. 1D14-2846·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

The trial court erred in granting appel-lee’s petition for protection against repeat violence because appellant was not given a full opportunity to present evidence in opposition to the petition. Accordingly, we reverse the injunction and remand for a new hearing on the petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur. MARSTILLER, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snead v. Ansley, 160 So. 3d 952, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2015 WL 1650468 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

160 So. 3d 952 (Snead v. Ansley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samuel Parise v. Sally Selph
175 So. 3d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)