Snead & Co. v. Brager Bros.

148 Misc. 603, 265 N.Y.S. 449, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1828
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided May 5, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Steuer, J.

When this case was called for trial on the calendar it was answered “ Settled,” and a stipulation of settlement was placed upon the record. The terms of the settlement were that the plaintiff was to deliver a specified number of patterns to the defendant and the defendant was to pay $800. Plaintiff later discovered that it did not have the number of patterns specified, which, at the time of settling, it believed were in its possession. It makes this motion to be relieved of its stipulation and to restore the case for trial. This court has no power to grant the relief requested. Plaintiff’s remedy is to bring an equitable action to set aside the stipulation and to recover upon its original claim. (Equitable Trust Co. v. MacLaire, 77 Misc. 116.)

Motion denied; ten dollars costs. Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snead & Co. v. Brager Bros., 148 Misc. 603, 265 N.Y.S. 449, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1828 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1930).

148 Misc. 603 (Snead & Co. v. Brager Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Porter Flushing Realty, Inc.
40 Misc. 2d 405 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Antenna Systems Corp. v. Entron Inc.
34 Misc. 2d 739 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Kynin v. Grand Plaza Caterers, Inc.
148 Misc. 156 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1933)