Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc.
532 U.S. 975, 121 S. Ct. 1609, 149 L. Ed. 2d 474, 69 U.S.L.W. 3671, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2966
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 16, 2001·No. No. 00-6862·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc., 532 U.S. 975, 121 S. Ct. 1609, 149 L. Ed. 2d 474, 69 U.S.L.W. 3671, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2966 (2001).
532 U.S. 975 (Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
153 A.3d 615 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2016)
Minor I Doe v. School Board for Santa Rosa County
264 F.R.D. 670 (N.D. Florida, 2010)
Wolfe v. Clear Title, LLC
654 F. Supp. 2d 929 (E.D. Arkansas, 2009)
Allen v. Garden City Co-Op, Inc.
651 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (D. Kansas, 2009)
James v. WASH DEPOT HOLDINGS, INC.
463 F. Supp. 2d 1369 (S.D. Florida, 2006)
Charles W. Moore, (01-6372) (01-6536) v. Moses Freeman, in His Individual and Official Capacities, and the City of Chattanooga, (01-6372) (01-6536)
355 F.3d 558 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Altenhofen v. Fabricor, Inc.
81 S.W.3d 578 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
Bailey v. Gulf Coast Transportation, Inc.
280 F.3d 1333 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)