Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), and State of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenor

228 F.3d 972, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8144, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10845, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24750
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), and State of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenor. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 F.3d 1189
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2000·No. 99-35204·Published

Opinion

228 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2000)

SNAKE RIVER VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PACIFICORP, (including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), Defendant-Appellee,
and
STATE OF IDAHO, Defendant-intervenor Appellee.

No. 99-35204

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted May 3, 2000
Opinion Filed October 3, 2000

NOTE: OPINION WITHDRAWN JANUARY 29, 2001. SEE NEW OPINION AT 238 F.3d 1189.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), and State of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenor, 228 F.3d 972, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8144, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10845, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24750 (9th Cir. 2000).

228 F.3d 972 (Snake River Valley Electric Association v. Pacificorp, (Including Utah Power and Light Company, a Division), and State of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related