S.N. Knights & Sons v. Martin
This text of 533 So. 2d 959 (S.N. Knights & Sons v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The employer appeals an order failing to rule on all pending issues which were ripe for adjudication. We reverse.
The employer contends that the deputy commissioner (deputy) erred as a matter of law in reserving juridiction to rule on whether the claimant’s complaints were a continuation of the original injury of July 27, 1984 or were the result of an accident or injury of September 7, 1985 or were unrelated complaints. This issue was ripe [960]*960for adjudication and the deputy erred in failing to rule upon it. South Miami Hospital v. Faz, 406 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Garitson v. Rifenburg, 380 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
This cause is reversed and remanded to the deputy to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, and to rule on this issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
533 So. 2d 959, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5194, 1988 WL 124733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sn-knights-sons-v-martin-fladistctapp-1988.