Smythe v. Graybon
This text of 29 How. Pr. 224 (Smythe v. Graybon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The composition deed was a valid [232]*232instrument, founded on a good consideration, and, therefore, binding on the plaintiffs. The consideration in such deeds does not proceed from the debtor, nor from the other creditors who with the plaintiffs entered in its execution. The different creditors agree together to the terms proposed, and such agreement between themselves forms the mutual obligation by which all are bound. The average time of payment was twelve months after April, 1862. Until then, at least, the plaintiffs were bound to wait, irrespective of the questions which arise in connection with the assignment subsequently executed. This action on this account was premature. It becomes unnecessary to examine any other questions in this case.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
. Clerke, J. I am in favor of an affirmance for the reasons specified by the judge who tried the cause, namely, that the defendants did precisely what was promised in the composition deed, and that the evidence tended to show that fifty per cent, would eventually be paid.
Sutherland, J. I dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 How. Pr. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smythe-v-graybon-nysupct-1865.