Smythe v. Cleary

127 A.D. 555, 111 N.Y.S. 872, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 8, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A.D. 555 (Smythe v. Cleary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smythe v. Cleary, 127 A.D. 555, 111 N.Y.S. 872, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

McLaughlin, J.:

Action to recover $10,750, valué of services alleged to have been performed and disbursements made by the plaintiff while acting as the attorney for the defendant.

[556]*556The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is an attorney and counselor at law, duly, admitted and licensed to practice in all the courts of the State of Massachusetts, and for more than thirty years has made a specialty of closing estates of decedents where their heirs or distributees were lost or unknown, and in searching out and finding such unknown heirs and next of kin, and establishing family trees, being an expert in such work; that between the 2d of May, 1906, and about the 20th of March, 1907, he rendered work, labor and services to the defendant, at her request and instance, in the matter of investigating, tracing out and establishing the ancestry of the defendant and her relationship to one-Patrick White, deceased; and also in establishing the defendant’s right to a share of the said decedent’s estate and in protecting and securing such interest, which is of the válue of $25,000 to $35,000; and placed at her disposal information necessary to protect her interest in such estate ; that the services rendered were reasonably worth -the sum of $10,000;. that he also expended in behalf of defendant, in rendering such service, necessary disbursements to the amount of $.750.

Then follows an allegation that no part of such sum has been paid, and a demand for judgment therefor, with interest.

Upon motion of-defendant the court below has required plaintiff to make the complaint more definite and certain by stating the time when and the place where the request for work was made, the form or manner in which made, whether in writing or verbal, and if in writing setting forth a copy of the same. Also by stating whether the request was made directly by the defendant or through some other person, and if another person the name of such person; also setting forth the terms and provisions of the request “ as respects when the said work * * * were

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swartmore Textile Co. v. Morris Bernhard Co.
184 A.D. 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D. 555, 111 N.Y.S. 872, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smythe-v-cleary-nyappdiv-1908.