Smythe v. Banks

4 U.S. 329, 22 F. Cas. 710, 1 L. Ed. 854, 4 Dall. 329, 1797 U.S. App. LEXIS 21, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 210
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 1797·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

4 U.S. 329 (____)
4 Dall. 329

Smythe
versus
Banks.

Supreme Court of United States.

By the COURT.

The witness is, undoubtedly, privileged from arrest, for a reasonable time, to prepare for his departure, and return to his home, as well as during his actual attendance upon the Court. But the privilege does not extend throughout the term, at which the cause is marked for trial; nor will it protect him while the witness is engaged in transacting his general private business, after he is discharged from the obligation of the subpœna.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smythe v. Banks, 4 U.S. 329, 22 F. Cas. 710, 1 L. Ed. 854, 4 Dall. 329, 1797 U.S. App. LEXIS 21, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 210 (1797).

4 U.S. 329 (Smythe v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todd v. Correll
54 Pa. D. & C. 70 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Wilson v. Cody
8 P.R. Fed. 271 (D. Puerto Rico, 1915)
Sofge v. Lowe
131 Tenn. 626 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Jaster v. Currie
198 U.S. 144 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Linton v. Cooper
74 N.W. 842 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Starret's Case
1 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1788)