Smyly v. State
This text of 952 So. 2d 1261 (Smyly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David SMYLY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
David Smyly, Boca Raton, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Thomas A. Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation, claiming that the trial court erred in denying his motion for discharge under the speedy trial rule. However, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 does not apply to revocation of probation proceedings. See Piz v. State, 826 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Gonzalez v. State, 447 So.2d 381, 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We therefore affirm but remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation.
Affirmed and remanded.
WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
952 So. 2d 1261, 2007 WL 1062861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smyly-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.