Smyers v. Beam

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Smyers v. Beam

27 A. 884, 158 Pa. 57, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1540

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 30, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 103·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal by Edward Seifert is from the decree distributing the fund raised by the sale of J. B. Beam and Polly Beam’s real estate on executions of D. J. Smyers and others.

An examination of the record with special reference to the assignments of error has failed to satisfy us that either of them should be sustained.

So far as the constitutionality of the act of May 18, 1887, is involved, that question has been settled by opinion just filed in Purvis et al. v. Ross, No. 36 of this term. [Reported above, page 20.]

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, with costs to be paid by the appellant, Edward Seifert.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal by Edward Seifert is from the decree distributing the fund raised by the sale of J. B. Beam and Polly Beam’s real estate on executions of D. J. Smyers and others.

An examination of the record with special reference to the assignments of error has failed to satisfy us that either of them should be sustained.

So far as the constitutionality of the act of May 18, 1887, is involved, that question has been settled by opinion just filed in Purvis et al. v. Ross, No. 36 of this term. [Reported above, page 20.]

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, with costs to be paid by the appellant, Edward Seifert.

Smyers v. Beam, 27 A. 884, 158 Pa. 57, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1540 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

27 A. 884 (Smyers v. Beam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related