Smyer v. Southern Ry. Co.

96 S.E. 483, 110 S.C. 292, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 1
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 18, 1919
Docket10041
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 S.E. 483 (Smyer v. Southern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smyer v. Southern Ry. Co., 96 S.E. 483, 110 S.C. 292, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 1 (S.C. 1919).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Plaintiff brought this action in the Court of Common Pleas for Chester county against the Southern Railway Company and the defendant, Jones, one of the company’s locomotive engineers, for damages for the death of her testator, which she alleges was caused by the joint and concurrent negligence of the defendants in the county of Chester. The railway company is a foreign corporation, but it is doing business as a common carrier in this State, and owns and operates a railroad through the county of Chester, where the venue is laid, and where the tort is alleged to have been committed; and the defendant, Jones, is a citizen and resident of the county of Greenville. Jones moved for a change of venue to the county of his residence. His motion was refused, and he appealed. The order appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Hayes v. Railway, 98 S. C. 6, 81 S. E. 1102.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deese v. Williams
113 S.E.2d 823 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)
Campbell v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
159 S.E. 490 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 483, 110 S.C. 292, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smyer-v-southern-ry-co-sc-1919.