Smusch v. Ravitch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Smusch v. Ravitch

33 Misc. 766, 67 N.Y.S. 900

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 766 (Smusch v. Ravitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smusch v. Ravitch, 33 Misc. 766, 67 N.Y.S. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The testimony in this case is insufficient to establish a conversion. The defendants did not exercise acts of dominion over the chattels in question to the exclusion of plaintiffs rights as owner, and judgment should have been awarded to the defendants.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gormaw, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new- trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The testimony in this case is insufficient to establish a conversion. The defendants did not exercise acts of dominion over the chattels in question to the exclusion of plaintiffs rights as owner, and judgment should have been awarded to the defendants.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gormaw, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new- trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 766, 67 N.Y.S. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smusch-v-ravitch-nyappterm-1900.