Smothers v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

359 F. Supp. 723, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13449
CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedMay 29, 1973
Docket69-1900-AAH
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 F. Supp. 723 (Smothers v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smothers v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 359 F. Supp. 723, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13449 (C.D. Cal. 1973).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HAUK, District Judge.

The Third Cause of Action (Fourth Cause of Action in the original Complaint) of plaintiff Comedic Productions, Inc. (hereinafter sometimes “Comedic”), for copyright infringement :by defendant (hereinafter sometimes “CBS”), having come on for trial before the Court, sitting without a jury, on the 18th, 20th and 23rd days of April, 1973, and the Court having heard and reviewed all. of the evidence and arguments, both oral and written, presented by each of the parties, the Court hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Federal jurisdiction and venue are properly invoked under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, the plaintiff being a California corporation and the defendant being a New York corporation, with all parties doing business within the Central District of the State of California. The amount in controversy, exclusive of costs and interest, exceeds $10,000.00. Jurisdiction and venue properly lie on the additional basis of 17 U.S.C.A. § 101 pertaining to copyright infringement.

2. Comedic holds and, prior to the commencement of this action, held valid Certificates of Registration on videotapes of the following television programs in the television series known as the “Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour”:

Certificate Number Production Number
MP 19293 0207
MP 19294 0209
MP 19295 0212
MP 19296 0217
MP 19297 0219
MP 19298 0221
MP 19299 0222

3. At all times material to this action, Comedic was and is the owner of the copyrights in the aforesaid videotapes and programs and said copyrights were and are valid in all respects.

4. At all times material hereto, CBS knew that Comedic was the owner of the copyrights listed above.

5. Prior to April 3, 1969, there was in force and effect an agreement between Comedie and CBS providing, among other things, that Comedic would license to CBS various videotapes of programs in the “Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour”.

6. On April 3, 1969, CBS, without legal justification, terminated the aforesaid agreement. The jury, in trying the other causes of action in this matter, has determined that said termination by CBS constituted a material breach of the agreement between the parties and the Court accepts and adopts that finding in making the finding No. 10 hereinafter, pursuant to stipulation of the parties.

7. After the breach by CBS, there still remained to be broadcast, pursuant *725 to the agreement between Comedie and CBS, two original programs of the regular television season (programs #0225 and #0227). Both of these programs had been taped prior to the termination. Thereafter, CBS requested that Comedic issue licenses to CBS so that CBS could broadcast programs #0225 and #0227. (Plaintiffs’ Exhibit No. 172) Two such licenses were negotiated and finalized between the parties and the two programs were broadcast as scheduled. (Plaintiffs' Exhibit Nos. 120 and 122)

8. On April 22, 1969, Mr. Jack Purcell, CBS’ West Coast general counsel, advised Comedic through its representative, The William Morris Agency, that CBS intended to broadcast the seven “rerun” programs that form the subject matter of this copyright infringement action. (Plaintiffs’ Exhibit No. 171) The William Morris Agency responded to Mr. Purcell, stating that since CBS had breached the basic agreement, it had no right or authority to broadcast the seven reruns but the Morris Agency offered to negotiate licenses for these seven programs. (Plaintiffs’ Exhibit No. 124)

9. The parties never reached an agreement concerning the licenses for the seven rerun programs, or any of them, and no such licenses or other permission to broadcast the programs was granted to CBS. CBS thereafter broadcast the said rerun programs without the permission of Comedie and with actual notice that such permission was not granted.

10. The parties have stipulated (Reporter’s Transcript pgs. 5363-5370), and the Court finds that pursuant to the jury’s verdict on the First Cause of Action herein, the broadcast of these seven rerun programs infringed the copyrights of Comedic.

11. The license fee as set forth in the agreement which was breached by CBS was $60,000.00 per program for rerun programs. Prior to the first broadcast of the seven repeat programs here in issue, the parties agreed that this price of $60,000 per program was the proper price for each said broadcast.

12. The contract price to be paid by CBS to Comedic for the broadcasting of seven rerun programs, in the event CBS had not breached the agreement was $420,000.00.

13. The sum of $420,000.00 was not paid by CBS to Comedic.

14. It is agreed by the parties, and the Court finds, that the sum of $246,-421.39 was properly deductible by CBS and was charged against the sum of $420,000.00; and, that the former sum represents payments actually made by CBS for residual fees to individuals and corporations entitled thereto, and pension and welfare payments required by various unions. The sum of $420,000.00 less the $246,421.39, leaves a difference of $173,578.61, which was not paid by CBS to Comedic in connection with the seven rerun programs.

15. The aforesaid sum of $173,578.-61 not paid by CBS to Comedic is made up as follows: At the time CBS breached the agreement, program- #0226 was scheduled to be broadcast by CBS but it was not broadcast by CBS. CBS had paid Comedic $170,000.00 for program #0226 (less certain so-called “below-the-line” charges) the amount to be paid-pursuant to the agreement between, Comedie and CBS, but CBS subsequently charged that amount (less certain uncontested inter-party adjudgment resulting in a net charge of $155,861.29) against said $420,000.00. CBS also charged against said $420,000.00 an amount of $2,717.32 for “West-to-East cable rental” in connection with program #0223 and $15,000.00 for “Defense costs for Jackie Mason suit” in connection with the same program, resulting in a total of $173,-578.61 charged by CBS against said $420,000.00. This sum of $173,578.61 is claimed by Comedie as its actual damage. CBS’s actual cost incurred for the West to East Coast cable rental in connection with program #0223 was $2,-143.50. CBS’s actual defense costs incurred to date in connection with the *726 suit brought by Jackie Mason against CBS are $7,286.40.

16. The “below-the-line” charges payable to CBS in connection with program #0226 totalled $42,516.00 and were paid by Comedie to CBS.

17. The amount paid by Comedic to Knave Productions Inc. (a corporation wholly owned by Tom and Dick Smothers which had loaned the services of Tom and Dick Smothers to Comedic) for the services of Tom and Dick Smothers in connection with program #0226 was $40,000.00.

18. As set forth in Conclusion of Law No. 6, infra,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 F. Supp. 723, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smothers-v-columbia-broadcasting-system-inc-cacd-1973.