Smoot v. Washington National Insurance

277 N.E.2d 307, 360 Mass. 868
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 10, 1971·Published

Opinion

This is an appeal from a final decree dismissing a bill to compel the defendant (Washington) to issue policies of life and health insurance to the plaintiff. The suit is based on an alleged contract of insurance which arose as a result of certain alleged conduct of one of Washington’s general agents. After making detailed and lengthy findings of fact, the judge ruled that no contract of insurance was made between Washington and the plaintiff. Questions of fact, including the credibility of the witnesses, are within the exclusive domain of the judge and will not be set aside unless plainly wrong. Younker v. Pacelli, 354 Mass. 738, 741. A review of the record in this case indicates beyond any doubt that there was substantial and weighty evidence to support each of the findings made by the judge. The appeal is frivolous.

Decree affirmed with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smoot v. Washington National Insurance, 277 N.E.2d 307, 360 Mass. 868 (Mass. 1971).

277 N.E.2d 307 (Smoot v. Washington National Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Younker v. Pacelli
242 N.E.2d 141 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1968)