Smook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Smook v. State

1911 OK CR 521, 118 P. 1116, 6 Okla. Crim. 692, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 512

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 25, 1911·No. No. A-986.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Joe Smook, was convicted at the September, 1910, terfn of the county court of Latimer county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No briefs have been filed upon the part of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument. The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm under rule 4, for want of prosecution. The motion is well taken and is sustained, and the judgment is affirmed with directions to enforce it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Joe Smook, was convicted at the September, 1910, terfn of the county court of Latimer county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No briefs have been filed upon the part of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument. The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm under rule 4, for want of prosecution. The motion is well taken and is sustained, and the judgment is affirmed with directions to enforce it.

Smook v. State, 1911 OK CR 521, 118 P. 1116, 6 Okla. Crim. 692, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 512 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK CR 521 (Smook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.