Smolka v. Homer P. Snyder Manufacturing Co.

242 A.D. 750

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Per curiam memorandum. (Printed in companion case, Roberts V. Snyder Manufacturing Co., ante, p. 244.) All concur, except Edgcomb, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts in respect of want of probable cause, and for a new trial. Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smolka v. Homer P. Snyder Manufacturing Co., 242 A.D. 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 750 (Smolka v. Homer P. Snyder Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.