Smolenski v. Eastern Coal Dock Co.
95 A. 1079, 88 N.J.L. 387, 3 Gummere 387, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 339
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
[388]*388For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Vredenburgh, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smolenski v. Eastern Coal Dock Co., 95 A. 1079, 88 N.J.L. 387, 3 Gummere 387, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 339 (N.J. 1915).
95 A. 1079 (Smolenski v. Eastern Coal Dock Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Engelbretson v. American Stores
139 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Engelbretson v. American Stores
139 A.2d 10 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Neil v. Public Utilities Commission
178 P. 271 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1919)