Smithwick v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
This text of 63 S.E. 1134 (Smithwick v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence tends to prove that the plaintiff was seriously injured in an accident caused by the train of defendant running beyond the end of the track at the Louisburg station.
The negligence of the defendant was properly admitted. There was no issue as to contributory negligence submitted, and the several assignments of error relate to the instructions of the court upon the issue of damage.
Upon examination we found no substantial error committed by the judge below, and there is- nothing disclosed by the record which we think necessitates a new trial.
No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E. 1134, 150 N.C. 39, 1908 N.C. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smithwick-v-seaboard-air-line-railway-co-nc-1908.