Smith's Lessee v. Steele

General Court of Virginia

Smith's Lessee v. Steele

3 Md. 103

DecidedSeptember 15, 1792

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Md. 103 (Smith's Lessee v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith's Lessee v. Steele, 3 Md. 103 (Va. Super. Ct. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

[104]*104 The Court

(Chase, Ch. J.)

was of opinion that the office copy should be read in evidence to the jury, leaving them to determine the fact, whether the said deed was recorded within the time limited by law or not. The defendant excepted.

The defendant appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed, by reason of the appellant’s siot appearing, at November term, t 794.

Martin, (Attorney-General,) for the appellee?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[104]*104 The Court

(Chase, Ch. J.)

was of opinion that the office copy should be read in evidence to the jury, leaving them to determine the fact, whether the said deed was recorded within the time limited by law or not. The defendant excepted.

The defendant appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed, by reason of the appellant’s siot appearing, at November term, t 794.

Martin, (Attorney-General,) for the appellee?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Md. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smiths-lessee-v-steele-vagensess-1792.