Smith's Lessee v. Steele

General Court of Virginia

Smith's Lessee v. Steele

3 Md. 103

General Court of Virginia·Decided September 15, 1792·Published

Opinion

[104] The Court

(Chase, Ch. J.)

was of opinion that the office copy should be read in evidence to the jury, leaving them to determine the fact, whether the said deed was recorded within the time limited by law or not. The defendant excepted.

The defendant appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed, by reason of the appellant’s siot appearing, at November term, t 794.

Martin, (Attorney-General,) for the appellee?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[104] The Court

(Chase, Ch. J.)

was of opinion that the office copy should be read in evidence to the jury, leaving them to determine the fact, whether the said deed was recorded within the time limited by law or not. The defendant excepted.

The defendant appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed, by reason of the appellant’s siot appearing, at November term, t 794.

Martin, (Attorney-General,) for the appellee?

Smith's Lessee v. Steele, 3 Md. 103 (Va. Super. Ct. 1792).

Pincite

3 Md. 103 (Smith's Lessee v. Steele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.