Smith's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Smith's Estate

95 A. 338, 250 Pa. 67

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 26, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 114·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In view of the findings of the learned and careful president judge of the court below, the issue prayed for could not have been awarded. Those findings were approved by the entire court in passing upon the exceptions filed to them, and our review of the testimony has led us to the conclusion that they should not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed, at appellant’s costs, on the opinion of the court below dismissing the exceptions to the findings of the president judge.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In view of the findings of the learned and careful president judge of the court below, the issue prayed for could not have been awarded. Those findings were approved by the entire court in passing upon the exceptions filed to them, and our review of the testimony has led us to the conclusion that they should not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed, at appellant’s costs, on the opinion of the court below dismissing the exceptions to the findings of the president judge.

Appeal dismissed.

Smith's Estate, 95 A. 338, 250 Pa. 67 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

95 A. 338 (Smith's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related