Smith's Administrators v. Commissioners of Licking County
This text of 2 Ohio 312 (Smith's Administrators v. Commissioners of Licking County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is a difference of opinion among the judges as to the validity of the plea. But as they are unanimous in the opinion [289]*289that the judgment was erroneously entered, they do not decide upon the other matters. The statutory provision, in cases like this, is express, that the plaintiff shall “recover judgment for the amount of the bond, on which judgment an execution may issue for such sum as it may be ascertained will be sufficient to indemnify the person so suing.” The judgment in the case before us does not conform with this provision. It is, therefore, erroneous, and must be reversed. The court award a venire de novo, and remand the cause to the court of common pleas of Licking county, with leave to the parties to amend their pleadings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ohio 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smiths-administrators-v-commissioners-of-licking-county-ohio-1826.