Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathaway

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathaway

DecidedAugust 17, 2011

DocketC.A. No. PC-2003-4157

StatusPublished

This text of Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathaway (Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathaway, (R.I. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

¹ Paul Filippi, Sr. is a named party in Plaintiff's original and Amended Complaint; however, he is not identified in the caption of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint.

² By stipulation of the parties in February of 2008, Marion Filippi was substituted as a defendant with her sons, Paul C. Filippi, Steven C. Filippi and Blake A. Filippi.

AMENDED DECISION This Amended Decision is being filed to substitute the following section as it appears in the Decision filed on August 15, 2011.

On page 100, Section IV (6) is to read:

(6) The Filippis' motion for partial summary judgment as to Smithfield Estates' claims based on adverse or constructive possession is:

(a) Denied as to Smithfield Estates' claims premised on the acts of the Belchers and Sarah Hayes;

(b) Granted as to Smithfield Estates' claims premised on the acts of Mr. Conti.

The remaining contents of the original Decision filed on August 15, 2011 remain the same. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¹ Paul Filippi, Sr. is a named party in Plaintiff's original and Amended Complaint; however, he is not identified in the caption of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint.

² By stipulation of the parties in February of 2008, Marion Filippi was substituted as a defendant with her sons, Paul C. Filippi, Steven C. Filippi and Blake A. Filippi.

AMENDED DECISION This Amended Decision is being filed to substitute the following section as it appears in the Decision filed on August 15, 2011.

On page 100, Section IV (6) is to read:

(6) The Filippis' motion for partial summary judgment as to Smithfield Estates' claims based on adverse or constructive possession is:

(a) Denied as to Smithfield Estates' claims premised on the acts of the Belchers and Sarah Hayes;

(b) Granted as to Smithfield Estates' claims premised on the acts of Mr. Conti.

The remaining contents of the original Decision filed on August 15, 2011 remain the same. *Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Smithfield v. the Heirs of Hathaway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smithfield-v-the-heirs-of-hathaway-risuperct-2011.