Smitheron v. Owens
This text of 1 Wright 574 (Smitheron v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no appearance of the defendant below, and the plaintiff proceeded at his peril. It is true, the law ■declares a defendant who is served with process in court, for certain purposes, A plaintiff may prosecute the suit he has brought, to judgment, but he cannot substitute another for it. The judgment is reversed, with costs, and remanded back to be reinstated at the return of the writ, and for further proceedings.
[Summons, how waived; Whitehead v. Post, 3 W. L. M. 195. 200.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wright 574, 1 Ohio Ch. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smitheron-v-owens-ohio-1834.