Home/Supreme Court/Smitherman v. Virginia

Smitherman v. Virginia

405 U.S. 1045, 92 S. Ct. 1308
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 3, 1972
DocketNo. 71-716
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 405 U.S. 1045 (Smitherman v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smitherman v. Virginia, 405 U.S. 1045, 92 S. Ct. 1308 (1972).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Va. Motion to dispense with printing petition and motion of respondent for leave to dispense with printing brief granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bob T. Moore and Susan Moore v. Ashland Chemical, Inc. And Ashland Oil, Inc.
126 F.3d 679 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Kauai Hotel, L.P. v. County of Kaua'i
915 P.2d 1358 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)
Tax Appeal of County of Maui v. KM HAW.
915 P.2d 1349 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)
Tax Appeal of Bishop Square Associates v. City & County of Honolulu
873 P.2d 770 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu
868 P.2d 1193 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Primavera v. Celotex Corp.
608 A.2d 515 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Moore v. Polish Power, Inc.
720 S.W.2d 183 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
In Re Stern
50 B.R. 285 (E.D. New York, 1985)
State v. Huffstetler
322 S.E.2d 110 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1984)
In Re the Tax Appeal of O.W. Ltd. Partnership
668 P.2d 56 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1983)
James W. Williams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
584 F.2d 90 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Baker
577 F.2d 1147 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 622, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8310 Nora Lewis, Elizabeth Bullock, Mary Carter, Betty Johnson, and Gertrude Moody, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Tobacco Workers' International Union, an Unincorporated Association, Philip Morris, Incorporated, a Corporation, and Local 203, Tobacco Workers' International Union, an Unincorporated Association, Nora Lewis, Elizabeth Bullock, Mary Carter, Betty Johnson, and Gertrude Moody, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Local 203, Tobacco Workers' International Union, an Unincorporated Association, and Philip Morris, Incorporated, a Corporation, Tobacco Workers' International Union, an Unincorporated Association, Nora Lewis, Elizabeth Bullock, Mary Carter, Betty Johnson, and Gertrude Moody, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Philip Morris, Incorporated, a Corporation, Tobacco Workers' International Union, an Unincorporated Association, and Local 203, Tobacco Workers' International Union, an Unincorporated Association
577 F.2d 1135 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Hanna v. State
546 S.W.2d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
People v. Triplett
243 N.W.2d 665 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Jordan v. Weaver
472 F.2d 985 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 U.S. 1045, 92 S. Ct. 1308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smitherman-v-virginia-scotus-1972.