Smitherman v. Smitherman

85 So. 920, 80 Fla. 342
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 29, 1920·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This- cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree aforesaid, and -argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no-error in the said.Decree; it-is, -therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the.Court that the said Decree of. the Circuit Court ,be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, . .

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur^ Browne, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smitherman v. Smitherman, 85 So. 920, 80 Fla. 342 (Fla. 1920).

85 So. 920 (Smitherman v. Smitherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.