Smitherman v. Gelb

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedNovember 26, 2018
Docket1:17-cv-11700
StatusUnknown

This text of Smitherman v. Gelb (Smitherman v. Gelb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smitherman v. Gelb, (D. Mass. 2018).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

HAROLD SMITHERMAN, Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-11700-PBS BRUCE GELB, et al., Defendants. ORDER

November 26, 2018

Bowler, U.S.M.J. For the reasons stated below, the Court orders that the plaintiff either pay the balance of the filing fee or file a new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on or before December 19, 2018. At the time pro se plaintiff Harold Smitherman commenced this action, he was incarcerated. When the Court granted his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court assessed an initial partial filing fee and required that the remainder of the $350.00 fee be collected over time. (Docket Entry ## 6, 7). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) (allowing indigent prisoner plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee but requiring that the fee be paid in full over time through periodic withdrawals from plaintiff’s prison account). Smitherman was released from prison in January 2018. The Court’s records indicate that he has paid $92.56 of the $350.00 filing fee, leaving a balance due of $257.44. Smitherman remains obligated to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full notwithstanding his release. If Smitherman is without income or

assets to pay the balance in a lump sum, he may file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis based on his current financial situation. See, e.g., McGann v. Comm’r of Social Sec. Admin., 96 F.3d 28, 30 (2d Cir. 1996) (“A released prisoner may litigate without further prepayment of fees upon satisfying the poverty affidavit requirement applicable to all non- prisoners.”); see also DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 F.3d 396, 398 (4th Cir. 2003) (same, citing McGann). Accordingly, if Smitherman wishes to prosecute this action, he must, no later than Wednesday, December 19, 2018, either (1) pay the $257.44 balance of the filing fee; or (2) file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to

comply with this order may result in dismissal of the action. The Clerk shall provide Smitherman with an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs which, if completed, signed, and returned to the Court, will be treated as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Marianne B. Bowler___ MARIANNE B. BOWLER United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeBlasio v. Gilmore
315 F.3d 396 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smitherman v. Gelb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smitherman-v-gelb-mad-2018.