Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals

617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 392
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 30, 1992·No. SC 14632·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 28 (AC 10431), is granted, limited to the following question:

“In acting on a subdivision proposal that conforms to applicable zoning regulations, may a planning and zoning commission take into account the fact that the property is located in a historic district and that the development of the property may be inconsistent with historic preservation of the district?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 392 (Colo. 1992).

617 A.2d 167 (Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greenwich
629 A.2d 1089 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)