Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals

617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 392

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 30, 1992

DocketSC 14632

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 617 A.2d 167 (Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 392 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 28 (AC 10431), is granted, limited to the following question:

“In acting on a subdivision proposal that conforms to applicable zoning regulations, may a planning and zoning commission take into account the fact that the property is located in a historic district and that the development of the property may be inconsistent with historic preservation of the district?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 28 (AC 10431), is granted, limited to the following question:

“In acting on a subdivision proposal that conforms to applicable zoning regulations, may a planning and zoning commission take into account the fact that the property is located in a historic district and that the development of the property may be inconsistent with historic preservation of the district?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-conn-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack