Smith v. Young

273 A.D. 815, 76 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4769

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The [816] decision at Special Term upon the second motion for - an examination before trial established the right of plaintiff’s counsel to continue the action. (Bloch V. Bloch, 131 App. Div. 859, 861.) However, the affidavits present triable issues of fact as to the amount due plaintiff at the commencement of suit, the amount due from plaintiff for rent, and as to possibility of endangering the 'entire trust estate involved in making the payments due to the plaintiff under the terms of the trust. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 868.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Young, 273 A.D. 815, 76 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 815 (Smith v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bloch v. Bloch
131 A.D. 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)