Smith v. Wynn

36 S.E. 970, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 889
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 9, 1900·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

When a person against whom a dispossessory warrant has been sued out, on the ground that he is a tenant holding over, files a petition setting forth grounds for equitable interference with the execution of such warrant, and containing allegations sufficient of themselves to show that the plaintiff has title to the land by prescription, it is error to dismiss the petition on demurrer thereto Since the demurrer admits the truth of those allegations, the possession of the plaintiff must, in dealing with the demurrer, be treated as a possession held by him as owner and ; not as tenant. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Wynn, 36 S.E. 970, 111 Ga. 884, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 889 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 970 (Smith v. Wynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Roseman
71 S.E.2d 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Flynn v. Merck
49 S.E.2d 892 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
Defloreo v. Tarvin
20 S.E.2d 29 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Phillips v. Hightower
185 S.E. 339 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Patterson v. Barron
169 S.E. 899 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Sims v. Etheridge
150 S.E. 647 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)