Smith v. Wyman
This text of 16 Me. 14 (Smith v. Wyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case was continued for advisement, and the opinion of the Court was afterwards prepared by
—
In this case, after the merits of the action of slander have been considered by a jury, with the utmost latitude of examination as to all subjects calculated to affect the character of one of the plaintiffs, from ten years of age, in qualifying the proof of malice and in mitigation of damages; exceptions are taken to the opinion of the court, that it was not every act of illicit intercourse on the part of a female which would authorize individuals to call her a whore. And that the attempt here to prove the truth of the words, if without success, might be regarded as evidence of express and continuing malice.
We think that the Judge upon the facts reported was justified in the instructions given. And the exceptions should be overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Me. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wyman-me-1839.