Smith v. Wright
1 Del. Cas. 134
Opinion
(Much irritated.) Did you make these terms?
Witness. The goods were not to be found. I did not know where they were.
Were not the goods the sheriff’s? Was it not his duty to exhibit the goods for public sale?
The sale was set aside without argument. Wilson, being plaintiff’s attorney, required that it might be without costs, which the court granted, saying the plaintiff was not to be blamed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Wright, 1 Del. Cas. 134 (Del. 1799).
1 Del. Cas. 134 (Smith v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shipley v. New Castle County
975 A.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2009)