Smith v. Wright
1 Del. Cas. 134
This text of 1 Del. Cas. 134 (Smith v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Wright, 1 Del. Cas. 134 (Del. 1799).
Opinion
(Much irritated.) Did you make these terms?
Witness. The goods were not to be found. I did not know where they were.
Were not the goods the sheriff’s? Was it not his duty to exhibit the goods for public sale?
The sale was set aside without argument. Wilson, being plaintiff’s attorney, required that it might be without costs, which the court granted, saying the plaintiff was not to be blamed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shipley v. New Castle County
975 A.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wright-del-1799.