Smith v. Winfrey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1660

WILLIAM EARL SMITH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OPRAH WINFREY,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS)

Submitted: August 18, 2010 Decided: September 9, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Earl Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Earl Smith appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(h)(3) for want of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Winfrey, No.

2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. May 18, 2010). The motion to

seal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED