Smith v. Wilson

58 Ga. 322
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 58 Ga. 322 (Smith v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Wilson, 58 Ga. 322 (Ga. 1877).

Opinion

Jackson, Judge.

This case was tried in the county court of McDuffie, and carried, by certiorari, to the superior court, where the judgment against Smith, the claimant, was affirmed.

Three grounds of error are alleged and insisted upon here : First, that the court refused to permit the claimant to traverse the grounds on which the attachment was founded, the property being levied on by a judgment founded on an attachment; second, that there was no declaration or bill of particulars filed in the county court; and, third, that the finding was against law and evidence.

1. The first point was decided against the claimant in the case of Foster vs. Higginbotham, 49 Ga., 263.

2. In respect to the second point, it is enough to say that no declaration is necessary in a justice court, and as the proceedings in the county courts are to be had as in justice courts ordinarily (Code, §285), we see no reason for a declaration to be filed there, when, as in this case, the amount is within the justice court jurisdiction. Section 3308 of the Code, which speaks of declarations being filed in attachments in county courts, must, we think, refer to cases where the amount involved is over $100.00. Thus the entire Code may be made to harmonize. Inasmuch as this attachment was issued upon a draft, no bill of particulars, other than a copy of the draft, was necessary.

3. The last point turned on the evidence. It was conflicting, but the preponderance, we think, is against the claimant. The judge of the county court thought so, and so did the superior court.

We affirm their judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Homecraft Spread Co.
13 S.E.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Netts v. Reed
188 S.E. 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Cochran Furniture Co. v. Corbett
176 S.E. 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
West v. Gainesville National Bank
124 S.E. 733 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Mayer & Glauber v. Brooks
74 Ga. 526 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ga. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wilson-ga-1877.