Smith v. Willoughby
127 S.E.2d 497, 106 Ga. App. 546, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 766
Opinion
The sole assignment of error complains that the trial court erred in refusing to open the default and allow the defendant to file an answer to the plaintiff’s petition. Held:
A direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment denying a motion to open a default. Code Ann. § 6-701; Mills v. Sauls, 90 Ga. App. 257 (82 SE2d 716); Commercial Nat. Bank of Cedartown v. Chapman, 209 Ga. 152 (71 SE2d 425), and citations. This court is without jurisdiction of the writ of error and the same must be
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Willoughby, 127 S.E.2d 497, 106 Ga. App. 546, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1962).
127 S.E.2d 497 (Smith v. Willoughby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARTOWN v. Chapman
71 S.E.2d 425 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Mills v. Sauls
82 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)