Smith v. Williams

19 So. 2d 575, 155 Fla. 83, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 477
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 3, 1944·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a case under the “Workmen’s Compensation Law” of Florida.

The deputy commissioner found in favor of claimant which finding was approved by the full Commission and on appeal the award of the full Commission was affirmed by the circuit court. We are asked to review the judgment of the circuit court.

The only questions presented challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the award.

Setting forth a statement of the facts established by the evidence can serve no useful purpose. It is sufficient to say that every fact and condition required to establish liability is affirmatively shown by the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Williams, 19 So. 2d 575, 155 Fla. 83, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 477 (Fla. 1944).

19 So. 2d 575 (Smith v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.