Smith v. Wiker Ex Rel. Wiker

192 So. 3d 629, 2016 WL 3017400, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 25, 2016
Docket2D14-3416
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 629 (Smith v. Wiker Ex Rel. Wiker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Wiker Ex Rel. Wiker, 192 So. 3d 629, 2016 WL 3017400, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

James Howard Smith, II, appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against stalking entered in favor of Shane Wiker, on behalf of Shaina Wiker (the neighbor). We affirm without comment the final judgment in its entirety except for one provision. For the reasons expressed in Smith v. Wiker, No. 2D14-3341, 2016 WL 3003257 (Fla. 2d DCA May 25, 2016), we reverse the portion of the injunc *630 tion that prohibits Smith from lingering on his driveway and remand for the -.trial court to more narrowly tailor the provision to prevent harassment of the neighbor.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded, >

MORRIS and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Wiker
192 So. 3d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 3d 629, 2016 WL 3017400, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wiker-ex-rel-wiker-fladistctapp-2016.