Smith v. . Whitley

135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 825, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 439
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 24, 1926·Published

Opinion

*826 Pee Cublam.

Defendants’ assignments of error upon this appeal cannot be sustained.

Plaintiff is seized in fee and in possession of tbe land described in tbe complaint, subject to tbe rights of defendants; defendants, by virtue of reservations in deeds under wbicb plaintiff owns said land, own tbe minerals in same. Defendants went upon tbe land and did tbe various acts thereon as alleged in tbe complaint. Tbe jury upon competent evidence has so found. Under a charge wbicb is free from error, such acts, or some of them, were found by tbe jury to constitute trespasses upon tbe rights of plaintiff. Tbe damages were assessed by tbe jury, upon sufficient evidence, under instructions wbicb are well sustained, both upon principle and by authoritative decisions of this Court. Tbe judgment is affirmed. There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. . Whitley, 135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 825, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 439 (N.C. 1926).

135 S.E. 927 (Smith v. . Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.