Smith v. White

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. White

17 Mo. App. 443, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 120

DecidedApril 21, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Mo. App. 443 (Smith v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. White, 17 Mo. App. 443, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case presents nothing for review [444]*444here. The appeal is wholly without merit, as no exceptions were saved by appellant to any rulings of the trial •court. We have examined the record proper and find no error. The action is one against the maker of a promissory note, and the answer is a general denial unverified. The execution of the instrument is thus confessed. No .assignment of errors or brief is filed by appellant in this court. Under such circumstances the conclusion is inevitable that the appeal was taken for the sole purpose of •delay.

The judgment of the trial'conrt,

with the concur rence of all the judges,

is affirmed with ten per cent, •damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case presents nothing for review [444]*444here. The appeal is wholly without merit, as no exceptions were saved by appellant to any rulings of the trial •court. We have examined the record proper and find no error. The action is one against the maker of a promissory note, and the answer is a general denial unverified. The execution of the instrument is thus confessed. No .assignment of errors or brief is filed by appellant in this court. Under such circumstances the conclusion is inevitable that the appeal was taken for the sole purpose of •delay.

The judgment of the trial'conrt,

with the concur rence of all the judges,

is affirmed with ten per cent, •damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Mo. App. 443, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-white-moctapp-1885.