Smith v. White Lift of Dalton, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. White Lift of Dalton, Inc.

244 S.E.2d 117, 145 Ga. App. 596, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2053

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 5, 1978

Docket55485

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 244 S.E.2d 117 (Smith v. White Lift of Dalton, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. White Lift of Dalton, Inc., 244 S.E.2d 117, 145 Ga. App. 596, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2053 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit against his employer, White Lift of Dalton, Inc., and Robert Shewell, the sole shareholder and officer of the corporation, to recover damages allegedly caused by defendants’ negligent failure to purchase workmen’s compensation insurance. This suit was brought after plaintiffs unsuccessful attempt to collect the amounts awarded to him by a workmen’s compensation administrative law judge for a work-related injury. On its own motion, the superior court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Held:

Plaintiff, in his complaint, admits that he is seeking recovery for damages by reason of personal injury arising out of and in the course of employment, which is subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Where an employee has accepted the Workmen’s Compensation Act his rights against his employer- to recover because of the breach of any duty arising out of that relation are determinable solely under the provisions of the Act, and are not determinable at common law. McLaughlin v. Thompson, Boland & Lee, Inc., 72 Ga. App. 564 (34 SE2d 562).

*597 Argued February 27, 1978 Decided April 5, 1978. Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge, Boyett, Wester & Bates, J. Raymond Bates, Jr., for appellant. Sam F. Little, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit against his employer, White Lift of Dalton, Inc., and Robert Shewell, the sole shareholder and officer of the corporation, to recover damages allegedly caused by defendants’ negligent failure to purchase workmen’s compensation insurance. This suit was brought after plaintiffs unsuccessful attempt to collect the amounts awarded to him by a workmen’s compensation administrative law judge for a work-related injury. On its own motion, the superior court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Held:

Plaintiff, in his complaint, admits that he is seeking recovery for damages by reason of personal injury arising out of and in the course of employment, which is subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Where an employee has accepted the Workmen’s Compensation Act his rights against his employer- to recover because of the breach of any duty arising out of that relation are determinable solely under the provisions of the Act, and are not determinable at common law. McLaughlin v. Thompson, Boland & Lee, Inc., 72 Ga. App. 564 (34 SE2d 562).

*597 Argued February 27, 1978 Decided April 5, 1978. Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge, Boyett, Wester & Bates, J. Raymond Bates, Jr., for appellant. Sam F. Little, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 S.E.2d 117, 145 Ga. App. 596, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-white-lift-of-dalton-inc-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack