Smith v. Western Assurance Co. of Canada

89 S.E. 533, 18 Ga. App. 461, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 19, 1916·No. 7294·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hodges, J.

1. Forfeiture of insurance under a fire-insurance policy, as a result of failure of the insured to furnish proofs of loss according to the terms of the contract, is not waived by the insurance company by having the loss investigated by an adjuster a few days after the fire; when the policy provides for such investigation and that the insurance company “shall not be held to have waived any provision or condition of this policy or any forfeiture thereof by any requirement, act, or proceeding on its part relating to the appraisal or any examination herein provided for.” See Phenix Insurance Co. v. Searles, 100 Ga. 97 (27 S. E. 779); Everett-Ridley-Ragan Co. v. Traders Ins. Co., 121 Ga. 228, 230 (48 S. E. 918, 104 Am. St. R. 99). .

2. There was no error in awarding a nonsuit. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Western Assurance Co. of Canada, 89 S.E. 533, 18 Ga. App. 461, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 533 (Smith v. Western Assurance Co. of Canada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buffalo Insurance v. Star Photo Finishing Co.
172 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Jones v. Pacific Fire Insurance
125 S.E. 470 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Jones v. Pacific Fire Insurance
119 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)