Smith v. Watson

28 Iowa 218
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 21, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 28 Iowa 218 (Smith v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Watson, 28 Iowa 218 (iowa 1869).

Opinion

Dillon, Oh. J.

l. pleading: tion. I. A petition to foreclose a mortgage contained in the body thereof the essential allegations describing the parties, setting forth the facts constituting the cause or action, the relief sought, etc., but was addressed as follows: “ To the judge of the District Court of Polk county, Iowa,” and failed to name the parties, plaintiffs and defendants, at the head thereof; nor was it headed with the word petition ” or the words petition in equity.” Held, that these defects were merely formal, and that the court did not err in refusing, on account thereof, to dismiss the action on the motion of the defendant.

a default : practice. II. Where the defendant is personally served in time and enters an appearance, but fails to answer, and a default taken, held, that this court will not decide have been erroneous in the District Court to refuse to set aside the default, unless an affidavit of merits should be filed, although an affidavit of the defendant’s attorney is made, to the effect that he supposed the court had granted him sixty days from the date of the application in which to answer, on which he relied, [220]*220whereas the entry made was for sixty days from the date of completed service.

3. Pleading : claim for interest. III. A petition set forth in full a copy of a promissory note drawing interest, and alleged “ that said amount specified in said note is wholly due and un- . • *; paid,” and asked “judgment for the amount due by the said note.” Held, that it was not erroneous to include in the amount of the judgment the interest due on the note up to the date the judgment was rendered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stenzel v. Kreger
299 N.W. 2 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
In Re Estate of Stenzel
299 N.W. 2 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Territory of Alaska v. First Nat. Bank
41 F.2d 186 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)
Sievert v. Selvig
222 N.W. 281 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)
Lynch v. Powers
198 Iowa 1060 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Wise v. Outtrim
117 N.W. 264 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1908)
Haines v. Connell
87 P. 265 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1906)
First National Bank v. Stone
98 N.W. 362 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Adams v. Kelly
74 P. 399 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)
Jensen v. Barbour
31 P. 592 (Montana Supreme Court, 1892)
Horton v. New Pass Gold & Silver Mining Co.
27 P. 376 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Iowa 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-watson-iowa-1869.