Smith v. Watkins
This text of 647 F. App'x 202 (Smith v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished. PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Antoinne Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have [203]*203reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Sergeant Watkins, No. 8:13-cv-03893-PWG (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2015). We also deny Smith’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 F. App'x 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-watkins-ca4-2016.