Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court

Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co.

246 U.S. 650, 62 L. Ed. 921, 38 S. Ct. 333, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1595

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 18, 1918·No. No. 188·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239, 246; Mac[651]*651farland v. Byrnes, 187 U. S. 246; Earle v. Myers, 207 U. S. 244; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418-419.

Mr. Ralph D.. Fleharty and Mr. J. S. Easby-Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. S. Flannery, Mr. G. B. Craighill and Mr. W. C. Carpenter for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239, 246; Mac[651]*651farland v. Byrnes, 187 U. S. 246; Earle v. Myers, 207 U. S. 244; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418-419.

Mr. Ralph D.. Fleharty and Mr. J. S. Easby-Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. S. Flannery, Mr. G. B. Craighill and Mr. W. C. Carpenter for defendant in error.

Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co., 246 U.S. 650, 62 L. Ed. 921, 38 S. Ct. 333, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1595 (1918).

Pincite

246 U.S. 650 (Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related