Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court

Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co.

246 U.S. 650, 62 L. Ed. 921, 38 S. Ct. 333, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1595

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 18, 1918

DocketNo. 188

StatusPublished

This text of 246 U.S. 650 (Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Washington-Southern Railway Co., 246 U.S. 650, 62 L. Ed. 921, 38 S. Ct. 333, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1595 (1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239, 246; Mac[651]*651farland v. Byrnes, 187 U. S. 246; Earle v. Myers, 207 U. S. 244; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418-419.

Mr. Ralph D.. Fleharty and Mr. J. S. Easby-Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. S. Flannery, Mr. G. B. Craighill and Mr. W. C. Carpenter for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239, 246; Mac[651]*651farland v. Byrnes, 187 U. S. 246; Earle v. Myers, 207 U. S. 244; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418-419.

Mr. Ralph D.. Fleharty and Mr. J. S. Easby-Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. S. Flannery, Mr. G. B. Craighill and Mr. W. C. Carpenter for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 U.S. 650, 62 L. Ed. 921, 38 S. Ct. 333, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-washington-southern-railway-co-scotus-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack